Agenda and minutes

The minutes were approved.

Apologies were received from Councillor John Marshall who would arrive late.

Received for items

Garden Suburb

Withdrawn from the agenda for further consideration by officers.

Golders Green

The Chairman withdrew this item from the agenda to allow further negotiation with the applicant.

Childs Hill

The Chairman withdrew this item from the agenda to allow further consultation with residents on the amended plans.

Golders Green

The Chairman referred this item up to the Planning Committee (next meeting 5^th November) as concerns had been raised about the Parking Survey.

Golders Green

Councillor Marshall was not present for this item.

The Planning Officer presented the report and addendum to the Committee.

No one spoke in objection or support of the application.

Mr Pick, the applicant, addressed the Committee.

The vote was recorded as follows:

For (approval) 6

Against (approval) 0

Resolved – the application was APPROVED.

Golders Green

Councillor Marshall was not present for this item.

The Planning Officer presented the report to the Committee.

An objector who had registered to speak was not present. The applicant was present but did not address the Committee.

The vote was recorded as follows:

For (approval) – 6

Against (approval) – 0

Resolved – the application was APPROVED.

Childs Hill

Councillor Marshall arrived during the presentation of this application so was not permitted to vote.

The Planning Officer presented the report and addendum to the Committee. The additional conditions set out in the addendum were noted.

Ms Katie Law spoke in objection to the application.

The agent for the applicant, Mr Kyriacou, addressed the Committee.

A statement from Cllr Anne Clarke was read out by the Planning Officer.

The vote was recorded as follows:

For (approval) – 3

Against (approval) – 3

The Chairman then used her casting vote in favour of the application.

Resolved – the application was APPROVED.

.

Childs Hill

The Planning Officer presented the report to the Committee.

Mr Howard Freeman spoke in objection to the application. He also spoke on behalf of Miss Emma Freeman.

Mr Alby, agent, spoke on behalf of the applicant.

The vote was recorded as follows:

For (approval) – 0

Cllr Ryde moved to refuse the application for the reasons below:

The proposed outbuilding by reason of its size, design, siting and proposed use would result in harmful noise and disturbance from associated general activity, resulting in a harmful loss of residential and visual amenity to neighbouring occupiers including the upper flats. The proposals would be contrary to policy DM01 of the Adopted Barnet Development Management Policies 2012.

The motion was seconded by Cllr Schneiderman.

The vote was recorded as follows:

For (refusal) – 4

Against (refusal) – 2

Abstained - 1

Carried – the application was REFUSED.

Childs Hill

The Planning Committee presented the report and addendum to the Committee.

Mrs Atotileto spoke in objection to the application.

Mr Steven Coleman, agent for the applicant, addressed the Committee.

Cllr Farrier moved a motion to add the below condition:

Condition 18: Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (or any order revoking and re-enacting that Order with or without modification), no development otherwise permitted by any of Classes A to H of Part 1of Schedule 2 of that Order shall be carried out within the area of the curtilage of the dwelling hereby approved.

Reason: To safeguard the amenities of neighbouring occupiers, the health of adjacent TPO trees and the general locality in accordance with policies DM01 of the Development Management Policies DPD (adopted September 2012).

The motion was seconded by Cllr Ryde.

The vote was recorded as follows:

For (approval) – 7

Against (approval) - 0

Carried – the application was APPROVED with the above condition.

West Finchley

Councillor Cohen gave apologies and left the meeting.

The Planning Officer presented the report to the Committee.

None of the objectors who had registered to speak addressed the Committee.

The agent for the applicant addressed the Committee.

The vote was recorded as follows:

For (approval) – 6

Against (approval) - 0

Resolved – that the application was APPROVED.

Finchley Church End

The Planning Officer presented the report and addendum to the Committee.

Mr Melvyn Whyte spoke in objection to the application.

Ms Zoe Donoff spoke in objection to the application.

Mr Julian Sutton, agent for the applicant, addressed the Committee.

Cllr Chairman moved a motion to refuse the application for the following reasons:

The proposed development by reason of its size, footprint, massing, and width would be an overdevelopment of the site, appearing unduly obtrusive and detrimental to the character and appearance of the streetscene and general locality. The proposals would be contrary to policy DM01 of the Adopted Barnet Development Management Policy 2012 and policy CS5 of the Adopted Barnet Core Strategy 2012.

The motion was seconded by Cllr Ryde.

The vote was recorded as follows:

For (refusal) – 5

Against (refusal) – 1

Carried – the application was REFUSED.

Woodhouse

The Planning Officer presented the report and addendum (with amended recommendation and amended condition 22) to the Committee.

None of the objectors who had registered to speak were present.

The applicant’s representative addressed the Committee.

The vote was recorded as follows:

For (approval) – 4

Against (approval) – 2

Resolved – the application was APPROVED.

Childs Hill

Councillor Ryde left the meeting for this item.

The Planning Officer presented the report to the Committee.

The applicant addressed the Committee.

The vote was recorded as follows:

For (approval) – 5

Against (approval) – 0

Resolved – the application was APPROVED.

Childs Hill

The Planning Officer presented the report to the Committee.

There were no registered speakers.

The applicant was not present.

The vote was recorded as follows:

For (approval) – 6

Against (approval) – 0

Resolved – the application was APPROVED.

East Finchley

The Planning Officer presented the report to the Committee.

The applicant was present but did not address the Committee.

There were no registered speakers.

The vote was recorded as follows:

For (approval) – 5

Against (approval) - 1

Resolved – the application was APPROVED.