Agenda and minutes

RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting held on 14 June 2017 be agreed as a correct record.

None.

None.

RESOLVED - That the Committee note the Planning Enforcement Quarterly Update for the period of April 2017 to June 2017.

Items contained within the addendum were considered under individual agenda items.

Officers presented the report and addendum.

Representations were heard from Councillor Graham Old, ward Councillor for Finchley Church End, Ms Ruth Geiger, Chair of the Friends of Windsor Open Space and Andrew Tipping, the applicant.

Following discussion of the item, the Chairman moved to the recommendation in the report, initially taking a vote whether to refuse the application as the

specified pruning would detrimentally affect the appearance of the tree of special amenity value and would be premature in the absence of occupation of the structure.

It was RESOLVED that the application was refused for the reason in the officer report.

Votes were recorded as follows:

Officers presented the report and addendum.

Representations were heard from the applicant’s agent.

It was RESOLVED that the planning application was approved in accordance with the officer report and addendum.

The vote was unanimously in favour of approval

Officers presented the report and addendum

Representations were heard from Mr Gelley and the applicant’s agent.

It was RESOLVED that committee approved the planning application in accordance with the officer report and addendum.

Votes were as follows:

Officers presented the report and addendum

Representations were heard from Mr B Piechowicz and the applicant.

It was RESOLVED that committee approved the planning application in accordance with the officer report and addendum;

Recommendation: Notwithstanding the provisions of any development order made under Section 59 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (or any Order revoking and re-enacting that Order) no windows or doors, other than those expressly authorised by this permission, shall be placed at any time in the south east elevation(s), of the extension(s) hereby approved, facing 71 Friern Watch Avenue, N12

Reason: To safeguard the privacy and amenities of occupiers of adjoining residential properties in accordance with policy DM01 of the Development Management Policies DPD (adopted September 2012).”

Votes were as follows:

Councillor Eva Greenspan left the room for this item. Councillor John Marshall presided as Chairman.

Officers presented the report and addendum.

Representations were heard from Mr Mark Ellis and the applicant’s agent.

A vote was taken on approving the application:

Councillor Ryde, seconded by Councillor Mittra moved that the application be REFUSED for the following reasons:

The proposed development would be an over-intensive use of the site property which by reason of its usage and general activity would be contrary to policies DM01 and DM09 of the Adopted Development Management Policies 2012.

A vote was taken on Councillor Ryde’s motion:

RESOLVED that the application be REFUSED for the reasons detailed above.

Officers presented the report and addendum

Representations were heard from the applicant’s agent.

A vote was taken on approving the application:

The Chairman used her casting vote and voted in favour of the application

It was RESOLVED that committee approved the planning application in accordance with the officer report and addendum.

Officers presented the report and addendum.

Representations were heard Mr Ezekei and Mr Tomasz Stepniak

A vote was taken on approving the application:

Councillor Greenspan, seconded by Councillor Ryde moved that the application be REFUSED for the following reasons:

The proposed conversion of the property to three flats would be an over-intensive use of the property at variance with the established  character this area which consists predominantly of single family dwellings and result in the loss of a single family dwelling. The proposals would be contrary to policy DM01 of the Adopted Barnet Development Management Policies 2012.

A vote was taken on Councillor Greenspan’s motion:

RESOLVED that the application be REFUSED for the reasons detailed above.

Officers presented the report and addendum

Representations were heard from Linda Aitken and the applicant’s agent.

A vote was taken on approving the application:

Councillor Ryde’s, seconded by moved that the application be REFUSED for the following reasons:

The proposed outbuilding by reason of its size, siting and design would be detrimental to the character and appearance of the general locality, and would harm neighbouring visual and residential amenity being contrary to policy DM01 of the Adopted Barnet Development Management Policies and policy CS5 of the Barnet Core Strategy

A vote was taken on Councillor Ryde’s motion:

RESOLVED that the application be REFUSED for the reasons detailed above.

Officers presented the report and addendum

Representations were heard Richard Maltaze the applicant’s representative.

It was RESOLVED that committee approved the planning application in accordance with the officer report and addendum.

Votes were as follows:

Officers presented the report and addendum

Representations were heard from the applicant’s agent.

It was RESOLVED that committee approved the planning application in accordance with the officer report and addendum.

Votes were as follows:

Officers presented the report and addendum

Representations were heard from the applicant Mr Neil Kaufman

It was RESOLVED that committee approved the planning application in accordance with the officer report and addendum.

Votes were as follows:

Councillor Melvin Cohen and Councillor Shimon Ryde left the room for this item.

Officers presented the report.

It was RESOLVED that committee approved the planning application in accordance with the officer report and addendum.

Votes were as follows:

None.