Agenda and minutes

Venue: Hendon Town Hall, The Burroughs, London NW4 4BQ. View directions

Contact: Jan Natynczyk 020 8359 5129 Email: Jan.Natynczyk@Barnet.gov.uk Email: governanceservice@barnet.gov.uk 

Items
No. Item

1.

Minutes of last meeting pdf icon PDF 86 KB

Minutes:

The Committee signed the minutes of the meeting that took place on 20 July as an accurate record.

2.

Absence of Members (if any)

Minutes:

None.

3.

Declaration of Members' Disclosable Pecuniary interests and Non Pecuniary interests (if any)

Minutes:

A declaration of interest was provided from the Chairman, Councillor Wendy Prentice in relation to the following items:

 

Items

Declarations

25 Hadley Highstone Barnet, EN5 4PU

Councillor Wendy Prentice declared a non disclosable interest as she knew the applicant.  Councillor Prentice took part in the consideration and voting process.

 

The Hollies, Gladsmuir Road, Barnet EN5 4PJ

Councillor Wendy Prentice declared a non disclosable interest as she knew the applicant and one of the registered speakers.  Councillor Prentice took part in the consideration and voting process.

 

 

4.

Report of the Monitoring Officer (if any)

Minutes:

None.

6.

25 Hadley Highstone Barnet EN5 4PU (High Barnet) pdf icon PDF 460 KB

Minutes:

The Committee noted the addendum to the officer’s report which was circulated.

 

Councillor Stephen Sowerby stated that he was not in favour of the application and moved a motion with reasons to vote against the Officer’s recommendation which was supported and seconded by Councillor Alison Cornelius.   

 

The Chairman Councillor Wendy Prentice called for the Committee to resolve the item and therefore requested a show of hands.  The vote recorded was recorded:

 

For the Officer’s recommendation - 1

Against the Officer’s recommendation - 4

Abstained - 2

 

The Committee refused the application which was against the Officer’s recommendation for the following reasons:

 

 

The Committee were concerned that the removal of the existing footpath which ran parallel to and adjacent with a similar footpath at the adjoining terrace property no. 27 would disrupt the symmetry which currently exists at this and neighbouring properties. It was considered that this was an attractive feature, characteristic of this part of the conservation area. The introduction of this curved path, with its exit from the site being centrally positioned would disrupt the strong symmetry that exists and would appear incongruous in this location, failng to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of this part of the conservation area. Accordingly the application was refused for the following reason:-

 

The proposed footpath would by reason its siting, appearance and lack of symmetry with the footpaths at nos 21, 23 and 27  Hadley Highstone, detract from the character and appearance of this part of the Monken Hadley Conservation Area and would fail to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of this part of the conservation area contrary to policies CS NPPF, and CS5 of the Local Plan Core Strategy (adopted September 2012), policies DM01 and DM06 of the Local Plan Development Management Policies (Adopted September 2012), Residential Design Guidance SPD (adopted April 2013) and Monken Hadley Conservation Area Character Appraisal (January 2007)

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.

54 Longland Drive London N20 8HJ (Totteridge) pdf icon PDF 517 KB

Minutes:

The Committee noted the addendum to the Officer’s report which was circulated.

 

Having considered the report and the oral representations from Mr Hodge and Ms Joyce Lucas (who spoke as a substitute speaker for Mr Steven Mitra) who both spoke in objection to application and a response from the applicant the Committee:

 

Approved the application as set out in the report and the addendum to the Officer’s report.

 

The recorded vote was:

 

For the officer’s recommendation 3

Against the officer’s recommendation 0

Abstained 4

 

 

8.

The Hollies Gladsmuir Road Barnet EN5 4PJ (High Barnet) pdf icon PDF 481 KB

Minutes:

The Committee noted the addendum to the officer’s report which was circulated.

 

Having considered the report and the oral representations from Dr Alastair Reith and Mr Michael Smith who both spoke in objection and a response from the applicant’s agent resolved to:

 

The applicant outlined in his representation that if the Committee was minded to reverse the Officer’s recommendation and approve the scheme then he accepted the conditions which the Planning Officer could supply. 

 

The Chairman moved that a vote be taken and requested that the Committee vote to support the Officers recommendation to refuse the application inline with the Officer’s recommendations.

 

The vote in respect to this was 0.

 

The Chairman moved to reverse the Officers recommendations and called the Committee to vote to approve the application having heard verbally the relevant planning conditions from the attending Planning Officer.

 

The vote to overturn the Officer’s decision was 5

2 Members of the Committee voted to abstain

 

The Chairman moved to adjourn the decision to consider and approve the conditions to later in meeting, thus allowing the Planning Officer time to verbally present and communicate each condition.  This was agreed by the Committee.

  

This item was reconvened in order to determine the conditions which supported the resolution to reverse the Officers recommendation.    The Governance Officer in attendance outlined that the Committee should be required to consider each condition in order to make an accurate decision.  The Planning Officer therefore outlined and confirmed each condition and informative which was considered by the Committee and agreed. 

 

Having considered the above the Chipping Barnet Area Planning Committee:

 

Approved the following conditions and informatives that led to the approved application:

 

 

1.     The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: Design and Access Statement dated June 2016 , 392712-11, 392712-12,

                       

            Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning and so as to ensure that the development is carried out fully in accordance with the plans as assessed in accordance with Policies CS NPPF and CS1 of the Local Plan Core Strategy DPD (adopted September 2012) and Policy DM01 of the Local Plan Development Management Policies DPD (adopted September 2012).

2         This development must be begun within three years from the date of this permission.    

                       

           Reason: To comply with Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.

 

3         No development shall take place until a 'Demolition & Construction Method Statement' has been submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Local Planning Authority. The Statement shall provide for: access to the site; the parking of vehicles for site operatives and visitors; hours of construction, including deliveries, loading and unloading of plant and materials; the storage of plant and materials used in the construction of the development; the erection of any means of temporary enclosure or security hoarding and measures to prevent mud and debris being carried on to the public highway and ways to minimise pollution. Throughout the construction period the detailed measures  ...  view the full minutes text for item 8.

9.

Site Of Former 22 Buxted Road London N12 9AS (Coppetts) pdf icon PDF 356 KB

Minutes:

Having considered the report and the oral representations from Ms Betsey who spoke in objection the Committee resolved to:

 

Approve the application subject to the additional conditions found below which the Chairman moved which were seconded by Councillor Alison Cornelius.    

 

The Chairman called for the vote and stated that this included the additional conditions (found below).

 

Vote for 5

Against 2

 

Additional conditions as follows:-

 

1)     The property shall be used as self-contained units as shown on the hereby approved drawings under Class C3 (a) and no other purpose (including any other purpose in Class C3 or C4 of the Schedule to the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987, or in any provision equivalent to that Class in any statutory instrument revoking and re-enacting that Order, with or without modification).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reason:

To enable the Local Planning Authority to exercise control of the type of use within the category in order to safeguard the amenities of the area

 

2.     Within two months from the date of this permission, details of cycle storage provision for the flat hereby approved shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority.

The details as approved shall be provided in accordance with the approved details within two months from the date of the approval of the details and shall be permanently retained in accordance with details as approved thereafter.

 

Reason:  To ensure that adequate cycle storage provision is made in the interests of highway and pedestrian safety and the free flow of traffic in accordance with policy CS9 of the Local Plan Core Strategy (adopted September 2012) Policy DM17 of the Local Plan Development Management Policies DPD (adopted September 2012)

 

3.     Within 2 months from the date of this decision details shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority in respect of ensuring that privacy of neighbouring residents is not prejudiced by overlooking from the central rooflight in the rear facing roof slope serving the lounge area in the loft space.  The details as agreed shall be installed within two months of the date the details as approved and shall be permanently retained in accordance with the approved details.

Reason:  To safeguard the privacy and amenities of occupiers of adjoining residential properties in accordance with policy DM01 of the Adopted Barnet Development Management Policies DPD (2012).

10.

Century House 29 Union Street Barnet EN5 4HY (High Barnet) pdf icon PDF 203 KB

Minutes:

The applicant’s agent spoke in relation to this item and outlined the proposals contained in the Officer’s report. 

 

Councillor Stephen Sowerby moved conditions to refuse the application which was seconded by Cllr Alison Cornelius. 

 

The Committee having considered the report were requested to vote for the Officers recommendations which received one vote.

 

The Chairman moved to call on Members of the Committee to refuses the application subject to the reasons for refusal that were noted found below)

 

Five Members of the Committee voted against the officer’s recommendation– 5

Abstain – 1

For Officers Recommendation – 1

 

Reasons for refusal:

 

The roof extensions to the west side as existing and as proposed to be altered, together with the existing side and front windows are large and unsympathetic additions, resulting in significant harm to the character and appearance of this undesignated heritage asset, the street scene and the wider locality. They are not considered to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Wood Street Conservation Area. The proposal would be contrary to policies DM01 and DM06 of the Development Management Policies Development Plan Document (September 2012), policies CS NPPF, CS1 and CS5 of the Local Plan Core Strategy (September 2012), the Wood Street Conservation Area Character Appraisal and the Local Plan Supplementary Planning Document Residential Design Guidance (April 2013).

 

 

11.

Any item(s) the Chairman decides are urgent