Agenda and minutes
Venue: Hendon Town Hall, The Burroughs, London NW4 4BG
Contact: Email: Hendon@barnet.gov.uk
Note: Please note that the below agenda may not reflect the order in which items will be heard at the meeting. Two paper copies of the agenda only will be available at the meeting for members of the public. If needed, attendees are requested to print any specific agenda report(s).
No. | Item | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minutes:
RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting held on 18 November 2019, be agreed as a correct record. |
|||||
ABSENCE OF MEMBERS (IF ANY) Minutes: Cllr Ammar Naqvi was not present at the meeting. |
|||||
DECLARATION OF MEMBERS' DISCLOSABLE PECUNIARY INTERESTS AND NON PECUNIARY INTERESTS (IF ANY) Minutes:
|
|||||
Report of the Monitoring Officer (If any) Minutes: None. |
|||||
Addendum (if applicable) PDF 499 KB Minutes: Items contained within the addendum were dealt with under individual agenda items. |
|||||
19-5050-HSE 68 Francklyn Gardens PDF 383 KB Minutes: The Planning Officer presented the application and addendum.
An oral representation was made by the Applicant.
Following discussion of the item, the Chairman moved to vote on the recommendations in the cover report, which was to REFUSE the application for the reasons set out in the report.
The votes were recorded as follows:
For: 0 Against: 5 Abstain: 1
As a consequence of the vote the Chairman moved a motion that was seconded by Councillor Simberg to approve the application for the following reasons:
REASONS:
It is considered that the proposed hipped to gable and rear dormer extension (and its cumulative impact on the first floor rear roof extension) would not be an incongruous form of development and would not negatively harm the character of the application site, streetscene and the locality as proposed in the Officer’s report. It would therefore not be contrary to policies CS1 and CS5 of Barnet's Adopted Core Strategy (2012), policy DM01 of the Adopted Development Management Policies DPD (2012) and the adopted Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016)
Vote were recorded as follows:
For: 5 Against: 0 Abstain: 1
The committee therefore RESOLVED to APPROVE the application for the reasons detailed above and the Committee grants delegated powers to the Service Director – Planning and Building Control or Head of Strategic Planning to outline and implement the conditions for approval. |
|||||
19.0959.ful - Land rear of 4 Rundell Crescent, London NW4 3BP PDF 420 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Planning Officer presented the application and addendum.
An oral representation was made by the Applicant.
Following discussion of the item, the Chairman moved to vote on the recommendations in the cover report, which was to approve the application subject to conditions.
The votes were recorded as follows:
For: 5 Against: 0 Abstain: 1
The Committee therefore RESOLVED TO APPROVE the application subject to conditions as outlined in the officer’s report and addendum. |
|||||
19-2674-S73 Pillar Chapel PDF 436 KB Minutes: This item was withdrawn prior to the meeting. |
|||||
19-5519-HSE 10 Sunnydale Gardens PDF 285 KB Minutes: The Planning Officer presented the application and addendum.
An oral representation was made by the Applicant.
Following discussion of the item, the Chairman moved to vote on the recommendations in the cover report, which was to REFUSE the application for the reasons set out in the report.
The votes were recorded as follows:
For: 2 Against: 3 Abstain: 1
As a consequence of the vote Councillor Simberg moved a motion that was seconded by Councillor Fluss to approve the application for the reasons detailed below:
REASONS:
The proposal, by virtue of the scale and siting of the proposed front dormer window, is not considered to cause material harm to the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area, and is therefore not contrary to the expectations of Policy DM01(b) of the London Borough of Barnet: Local Plan (Development Management Policies) DPD (2012) and LB Barnet: Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016).
Vote were recorded as follows:
For: 3 Against: 2 Abstain: 1
The committee therefore RESOLVED to APPROVE the application for the reasons detailed above and the Committee grants delegated powers to the Service Director – Planning and Building Control or Head of Strategic Planning to outline and implement the conditions for approval.
|
|||||
19-6183-HSE 2 Cloister Gardens PDF 354 KB Minutes: Councillor Sargeant arrived during this item and did not take part or vote on the application.
The Planning Officer presented the application.
An oral representation was made by the Applicant.
Following discussion of the item, the Chairman moved to vote on the recommendations in the cover report, which was to REFUSE the application for the reasons set out in the report.
The votes were recorded as follows:
For: 0 Against: 5 Abstain: 0
As a consequence of the vote Councillor Simberg moved a motion that was seconded by Councillor Fluss to approve the application for the reasons detailed below:
REASONS:
The proposed alterations to existing roof, by reason of its size, scale and design, would not be detrimental to the character and appearance of the existing property, streetscene and wider locality. It would not be a disproportionate and incongruous addition to the existing dwellinghouse, which dwarfs the existing roof slope and forms an incongruous roof form, with a harmful impact to the appearance of the host property and the established character of the local area around 2 Cloister Gardens. It is therefore found not to be in conflict with Policy DM01 of the Development Management Policies DPD (Adopted 2012) and Policy CS5 (adopted 2012).
The votes were recorded as follows:
For: 5 Against: 0 Abstain: 0
The committee therefore RESOLVED to APPROVE the application for the reasons detailed above and the Committee grants delegated powers to the Service Director – Planning and Building Control or Head of Strategic Planning to outline and implement the conditions for approval.
|
|||||
19-4797-FUL 90 Sunny Gardens Road PDF 303 KB Minutes: The Planning Officer presented the application and addendum.
An oral representation was made by the Applicant.
Following discussion of the item, the Chairman moved to vote on the recommendations in the cover report, which was to approve the application subject to conditions.
The votes were recorded as follows:
For: 4 Against: 0 Abstain: 2
The Committee therefore RESOLVED TO APPROVE the application subject to conditions as outlined in the officer’s report and addendum.
|
|||||
Any Item(s) the Chairman decides are urgent Minutes: None. |