Agenda and minutes
Venue: Virtual meeting
Contact: Email: Hendon@barnet.gov.uk Please note that this will be held as a virtual meeting. An audio and video live stream of the meeting can be accessed using the link below’.
Link: Click here for the meeting
No. | Item |
---|---|
Minutes: Councillor Simberg MOVED that the minutes of the meeting dated 24 June 2020 be agreed as a correct record. This was SECONDED by Councillor Richman.
RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting dated 24 June 2020 were agreed as a correct record. |
|
ABSENCE OF MEMBERS (IF ANY) Minutes: None. |
|
DECLARATION OF MEMBERS' DISCLOSABLE PECUNIARY INTERESTS AND NON PECUNIARY INTERESTS (IF ANY) Minutes: None. |
|
Report of the Monitoring Officer (If any) Minutes: None. |
|
Addendum (if applicable) Minutes: None. |
|
Land Adjacent To 1 Booth Road London NW9 5JS - 20/0733/FUL - Colindale PDF 357 KB Minutes: The Committee received the report.
The Committee heard verbal representations from Mr Frank Timothy who spoke in objection to the item, and Mrs. Janet Long, who spoke in support of the item as the Applicant’s Agent followed by Councillor Zakia Zubairi, the Ward Member who also spoke in support. Members of the Committee had the opportunity to ask questions of the speakers.
Following discussion of the item, the Chairman moved to vote on the recommendation in the cover report, which was to REFUSE the application for the reasons set out in the report.
The votes were recorded as follows: For: 4 Against: 3 Abstain: 0
RESOLVED that the application be REFUSED for the reasons set out in the Officers’ report.
|
|
70 Abercorn Road London NW7 1JT - 19/6387/FUL - Mill Hill Ward PDF 331 KB Minutes: The Committee received the report.
The Committee heard verbal representations in support from the applicant, Mr Jonny Simmons, who spoke in favour of the application.
Members of the Committee had the opportunity to ask questions of the speaker.
Following discussion of the item, the Chairman moved to vote on the recommendation in the cover report, which was to REFUSE the application for the reasons set out in the report
The votes were recorded as follows: Against: 4 Abstain:3
Since the recommendation in the Officer’s Report had not been approved by MembersIt itwas then moved by Councillor Bokei and seconded by Councillor Richman that the application be APPROVED for the following reasons:
That the proposal is considered to be of a proportionate scale to the other properties in the area, and it is not considered to be detrimental to the character and appearance of the area and to the street scene.
Prior to moving to the vote, the Lawyer in attendance advised that the insertion of policy references in support of the approval and the listing of conditions should be delegated to Officers. The Planning Officer in attendance agreed with this proposed approach, and the Chairman therefore moved to the vote on this basis.
For (Approval) 4 Against (Approval) 0 Abstaining 3
RESOLVED that the application be APPROVED for the reasons detailed above.
|
|
Any Item(s) the Chairman decides are urgent Minutes: There were none. |