Agenda and minutes

Venue: Hendon Town Hall, The Burroughs, London NW4 4BQ

Contact: Email: finchleyandgoldersgreen@barnet.gov.uk Tel 020 8359 2315 

Note: Please note that the below agenda may not reflect the order in which items will be heard at the meeting. Two paper copies of the agenda only will be available at the meeting for members of the public. If needed, attendees are requested to print any specific agenda report(s). 

Items
No. Item

1.

Minutes of last meeting pdf icon PDF 65 KB

Minutes:

RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting held on the 22nd July 2019 be approved as a correct record.

2.

Absence of Members (If any)

Minutes:

Councillor Melvin Cohen sent his apologies.

3.

Declaration of Members' Disclosable Pecuniary interests and Non Pecuniary interests (If any)

Minutes:

None.

4.

Report of the Monitoring Officer (If any)

Minutes:

None.

5.

Addendum (if applicable) pdf icon PDF 102 KB

Minutes:

The Committee noted the addendum.

6.

Land To The Rear Of 85-87 Hodford Road London NW11 8NH 19/1904/FUL (AGENDA ITEM 11) pdf icon PDF 256 KB

Childs Hill

Minutes:

The planning officer introduced the report and addendum.

 

Professor Gower made a verbal representation in objection to the application.

 

A verbal representation was made by the applicant’s agent.

 

Following discussion of the item, the Chairman moved to vote on the recommendation to approve the application subject to conditions, as set out in the report and the addendum.

 

The votes were recorded as follows:

 

For

0

Against

6

Abstain

0

 

The motion to approve the application subject to conditions was therefore lost.

 

Councillor Ryde, seconded by Councillor Marshall, moved the motion to refuse the application for the following reasons:

-       The proposed development by reason of its size, siting and design, would appear incongruous and out of keeping within the streetscene and would be detrimental to the character and appearance  of the locality. As such the proposed development would be contrary to policies CS1, CS5 and CS NPPF of the Adopted Core Strategy (2012), policy DM01 of the Local Plan Development Management Policies DPD (2012) and the Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016).

 

Votes to refuse the application, for the reasons outlined above, were recorded as follows:

For

6

Against

0

Abstain

0

 

Therefore, the Committee RESOLVED to REFUSE the application for the reasons outlined above.

7.

Wellington Place Great North Road London N2 0PN 18/4897/FUL (AGENDA ITEM 10) pdf icon PDF 147 KB

Garden Suburb

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The planning officer introduced the report and addendum.

 

Mr Shelemy and Mr Roe made a verbal representation in objection to the application.

 

Following discussion of the item, the Chairman moved to vote on the recommendation to approve the application subject to s106, as set out in the report and the addendum.

 

The votes were recorded as follows:

 

For

0

Against

6

Abstain

0

 

The motion to approve the application subject to s106 was therefore lost.

 

Councillor Marshall, seconded by Councillor Farrier, moved the motion to refuse the application for the following reasons:

-       The proposed development by reason of the size, siting and design of the rooftop and staircase extensions would be out of keeping within the streetscene and would be detrimental to the character and appearance  of the locality. As such the proposed development would be contrary to policies CS1, CS5 and CS NPPF of the Adopted Core Strategy (2012), policy DM01 of the Local Plan Development Management Policies DPD (2012) and the Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016).

-       The proposed development by reason of the reduction in the size of the existing gardens, loss of access to the gardens from the existing first floor flats and siting of the new external staircases would  be detrimental to the amenities currently enjoyed by the existing residents.  As such, the proposed development would be contrary to policies CS1, CS NPPF of the Adopted Core Strategy (2012), policies DM01 and DM02 of the Local Plan Development Management Policies Development Plan Document (2012), the Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016) and Sustainable Design and Construction SPD (2016).

-       The proposed development would provide inadequate parking to serve the additional flats and in the absence of appropriate mitigation in the form of a legal agreement to prevent future residents from obtaining parking permits, would result in increased pressure for on-street parking which would be detrimental to highway safety and the free flow of traffic. As such the development would be contrary to policy CS9 of the Adopted Barnet Local Plan Core Strategy (2012) and policy DM17 of the Adopted Barnet Development Management Policies DPD (2012).

 

Votes to refuse the application, for the reasons outlined above, were recorded as follows:

For

6

Against

0

Abstain

0

 

Therefore, the Committee RESOLVED to REFUSE the application for the reasons outlined above.

 

8.

2 Grass Park London N3 1UB 19/1665/HSE (AGENDA ITEM 7) pdf icon PDF 216 KB

Finchley Church End

Minutes:

The planning officer introduced the report.

 

Mrs Renshaw made a verbal representation in objection to the application.

 

Following discussion of the item, the Chairman moved to vote on the recommendation to approve the application subject to conditions, as set out in the report.

 

Approval of the application was unanimously agreed.

 

The Committee RESOLVED to APPROVE the application subject to conditions.

9.

27 East End Road London N3 2TA 19/2540/RCU (AGENDA ITEM 8) pdf icon PDF 137 KB

Finchley Church End

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The planning officer introduced the report.

 

Dr Bryan made a verbal representation in objection to the application on behalf of her husband Mr Bryan. Dr Bryan also made a verbal representation in objection on behalf of herself.

 

Following verbal representations from the objectors, the Chairman moved the motion to defer the application to a later meeting, for a site visit to be conducted. The motion was seconded by Councillor Rich.

 

The votes on the motion to defer the item were recorded as follows:

For

5

Against

0

Abstain

1

 

Therefore, the Committee RESOLVED to DEFER the application for the reasons outlined above.

 

10.

179 Regents Park Road London N3 3PB 19/0285/S73 (AGENDA ITEM 9) pdf icon PDF 317 KB

Finchley Church End

Minutes:

The planning officer introduced the report and addendum.

 

Mr Chainrai made a verbal representation in objection to the application.

 

Following discussion of the item, the Chairman moved to vote on the recommendation to approve the application.

 

The votes were recorded as follows:

For

3

Against

0

Abstain

3

 

Therefore, the Committee RESOLVED to APPROVE the application as per the report.

 

11.

62 Church Crescent London N3 1BJ 19/2762/FUL (AGENDA ITEM 6) pdf icon PDF 197 KB

Finchley Church End

Minutes:

The planning officer introduced the report.

 

No verbal representations were made.

 

Following discussion of the item, the Chairman moved to vote on the recommendation to approve the application subject to conditions, as set out in the report.

 

Approval was unanimously agreed by the Committee.

 

Therefore, the Committee RESOLVED to APPROVE the application subject to conditions.

 

12.

Any item(s) the Chairman decides are urgent

Minutes:

None.