Agenda and minutes

The Chairman welcomed everyone to the meeting and explained the running order.

RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting held on 8 April 2019, be agreed as a correct record.

None.

None.

None.

The Committee noted the contents of the Addendum.

The planning officer introduced the report which related to 6 Neeld Crescent.

An oral representation in objection was made by Mrs Singh and by Mrs Singh on behalf of Mr De Pon.

An oral representation was made on behalf of applicant by Mr Breslin.

Following discussion of the item, the Chairman moved to vote on the recommendation in the cover report, which was to approve the application subject to the conditions in the report.

Votes were recorded as follows:

For - 11

Against - 0

Abstain – 0

The Committee therefore RESOLVED to APPROVE the application subject to the conditions as per the officer’s report.

The planning officer introduced the report and addendum which related to Phase 6b, Millbrook Park.

An oral representation in objection was made by Anita Varma and Bill Taylor.

An oral representation was on behalf of applicant by Tim Surgess.

Following discussion of the item, the Chairman moved to vote on the recommendation in the cover report, which was to approve the application subject to completion of a section 106 agreement and the conditions and recommendations in the report and addendum.

Votes were recorded as follows:

For -      4

Against - 7

Abstain – 0

As a consequence of the vote the Councillor Farrier moved a motion that was seconded by Councillor Greenspan to refuse the application for the reasons below.

‘The proposed development, by virtue of its excessive height, scale, massing and proximity to the boundary would represent an over development of the site resulting in a discordant and visually obtrusive form of development which would be detrimental to the amenities and future operations of the adjoining scout camp. The proposal would therefore be contrary to policy DM01 of the Barnet Local Plan Development Management Policies 2012.’

Votes were recorded as follows:

For -      7

Against - 4

Abstain – 0

The Committee therefore RESOLVED to REFUSE the application for the reasons outlined above.

The planning officer introduced the report and addendum which related to 70-84 and Land at Rear of Oakleigh Road North.

An oral representation in objection was made by the Councillor Cornelius, the local Ward Councillor.

An oral representation was made on behalf of applicant by Tim Surgess.

Following discussion of the item, the Chairman moved to vote on the recommendation in the cover report, which was to approve the application subject to completion of a section 106 agreement and the conditions and recommendations in the report and addendum.

Votes were recorded as follows:

For -       6

Against - 4

Abstain - 1

The Committee therefore RESOLVED to APPROVE the application subject to completion of a section 106 agreement and the conditions and recommendations as per the officer’s report and addendum.

The planning officer introduced the report and addendum which related to Brent Cross Cricklewood Regeneration Area.

Following discussion of the item, the Chairman moved to vote on the recommendation in the cover report, which was that delegated powers be given to the Brent Cross Planning and Transport Manager to APPROVE the Conditions Application subject to the completion of a satisfactory Deed of Variation to make the necessary amendments to the existing Section 106 Agreement dated 22^ndJuly 2014 attached to planning permission F/04687/13.

Votes were recorded as follows:

For - 11

Against - 0

Abstain – 0

The Committee therefore RESOLVED TO APPROVE the application subject to the conditions and recommendation as outlined in the officer’s report and addendum.

The planning officer introduced the report which related to 102 -124 Station Road and Car Park to the Rear.

Following discussion of the item, the Chairman moved to vote on the recommendation in the cover report, which was to approve the variation of the section 106 agreement dated 6 October 2016 in manner outlined in the officer’s report and addendum.

Votes were recorded as follows:

For - 9

Against - 2

Abstain – 0

The Committee therefore RESOLVED TO APPROVE the variation of the section 106 agreement dated 6 October 2016 as outlined in the officer’s report.

None.