Agenda and minutes

Venue: VIRTUAL MEETING

Contact: Governance Service Email: governanceservice@barnet.gov.uk 

Note: Please note this is a virtual meeting an audio recording of the meeting can be accessed via HTTP://BARNET.MODERNGOV.CO.UK/MGLISTCOMMITTEES.ASPX?BCR=1 

Items
No. Item

1.

Appointment of Chairman

Minutes:

RESOLVED that Councillor Linda Freedman be appointed as Chairman.

 

2.

Absence of Members (If any)

Minutes:

None.

3.

Declaration of Members' Disclosable Pecuniary interests and Non Pecuniary interests (If any)

Minutes:

None.

 

4.

Licensing Sub-Committee Hearing Procedure pdf icon PDF 230 KB

Minutes:

The Chairman explained the procedure that would be followed at the meeting.

5.

Report of the Trading Standards and Licensing Manager pdf icon PDF 8 MB

Minutes:

The Sub-Committee reviewed a premises licence variation for Cielo Prlr, 1 Charcot Road London NW9 5HG (the “Premises”). 

6.

Additional Information from Interested Parties pdf icon PDF 949 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The additional information was noted by the Sub-Committee.

7.

Motion to exclude the Press and Public

Minutes:

RESOLVED that the parties be excluded from the meeting, together with the press and public, in accordance with Regulation 14(2) of the Licensing Act 2003 (Hearings and Regulations 2005).

8.

Deliberation by the Sub-Committee in Private Session

Minutes:

The Sub-Committee deliberated in private session, accompanied by the Officer from HB Public Law and the Governance Officer.

9.

Re-admission of the Press and Public: Announcement of the decision of the Sub-Committee

Minutes:

The Sub-committee reconvened to consider an application by Mr Izzet Deniz Erpolat for a variation of the Premises Licence relating to Cielo Prlr, 1 Charcot Road Colindale London NW9 5HG under section 34 of the Licensing Act 2003.

 

The matter came before the subcommittee on the 4 August 2020 but was adjourned to today’s date (18 August 2020). The Applicant had requested an adjournment of the hearing on the 4 August which was granted by the subcommittee. This was because the subcommittee felt that it was in the interest of justice to admit additional information which was provided late from the objectors and to give the applicant sufficient time and an opportunity to respond to the late information provided by the objectors.

 

At the start of the hearing, the Applicant notified the Panel that he wished to withdraw his application. The reason the Applicant gave was that he currently had an application which was going through the planning process and decided that this was not the right time to extend the hours that was the subject of his application.

 

It was also stated on behalf of the Applicant’s representative, Mr Hayirola Berkpinar, that business did not need to expand its hours at this stage. The Chair asked if any of the objectors had any comments. None were made.

 

Consequent upon the Applicant withdrawing his application, the panel decided to dismiss the Applicant’s application.

 

 

 

 

10.

Any other Item(s) the Chairman decides are urgent

Minutes:

None.