Agenda and minutes

Venue: Hendon Town Hall, The Burroughs, London NW4 4BQ

Contact: Email: abigail.lewis@barnet.gov.uk 

Items
No. Item

1.

Minutes (Agenda item 1) pdf icon PDF 299 KB

Minutes:

Corrections to the Minutes of the meeting held on 12 October 2021:

 

Cllr Barry Rawlings was not present at the meeting held on 12 October 2021

 

Matters arising from the minutes of the meeting held on the 12 October 2021:

 

Agenda Item 8, Page 4 of the Minutes - Coronavirus and Vaccination Update:

The Director of Public Health, Dr Djuretic advised that there was no evidence to suggest that the uptake of the flu vaccine had been any higher this year, in comparison to previous years. Dr Djuretic would circulate figures from this year and last year to the Committee.

 

Agenda Item 9, Page 5 of the Minutes – Long Covid and Recovery of Services:

Dr Akinlabi would be invited to the next meeting of the Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee to present his presentation on Long Covid. The response to the question raised at the last meeting about whether Barnet had more cases than any of the other five North Central London boroughs or whether the number of cases was in proportion to its population, would be chased and circulated to members once received.

 

 

RESOLVED that subject to the correction outlined above, the Committee approved the Minutes of the Meeting held on 12 October as an accurate record.

 

 

2.

Absence of Members (Agenda item 2)

Minutes:

Councillor Hutton sent apologies.

 

3.

Declaration of Members' Interests (Agenda item 3)

Minutes:

Councillor Cornelius declared an interest by virtue of being the Vice-Chairman of Eleanor Palmer Trust.

 

4.

Report of the Monitoring Officer (Agenda item 4)

Minutes:

None.

5.

Public Question Time (If Any) (Agenda item 5)

Minutes:

A public question was submitted by Mr Samuel as follows:

‘I have a question about item 10 quality accounts.  I am a resident using Linux, an operating system for computers which is an open-source architecture, much more secure with personal sensitive data, than Microsoft systems, which are proprietary and full of software bugs.  The NHS is wasting time and money on its IT.  A former doctor complained on twitter that while working at the NHS he was forced to use windows computers and that he would spend a lot of time waiting for the computers to start.  Will our NHS re-consider its contracts which only allow Microsoft computers, which are open to viruses and take ages to boot-up’

 

The question would be answered during the relevant agenda item.

 

6.

Members' Items (If Any) (Agenda item 6)

Minutes:

None.

 

7.

Minutes of the North Central Sector London Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee (Agenda item 7) pdf icon PDF 254 KB

Minutes:

The Minutes of the meeting of the North Central London Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee held on 1 October were noted.

 

8.

Covid update and Flu Vaccination verbal update (Agenda item 8)

Minutes:

TheChairmaninvited the following to the table:

 

·         Dr Tamara Djuretic, Director of Public Health, LondonBorough of Barnet (LBB)

·         Deborah Sanders, Chief Executive, Barnet Hospital

·         Colette Wood, Director of Integration, North Central London Clinical Commissioning Group (NCL CCG) (jointed remotely)

·         Ms Bhavita Vishram, Public Health Strategist, LBB

 

Dr Djuretic explained that Barnet has seen a slight increase in the cases of Coronavirus, most of these being associated with children in school. She said that two cases of the new Omicron variant had been reported so far. However, there was evidence of community transmission of Omicron, as cases were no longer directly linked with overseas travel. She also confirmed that currently the new variant had not resulted in increased hospital admissions.

 

Dr Djuretic informed the Committee that the Coronavirus updates nationally had changed: mask wearing was now mandatory in public spaces, apart from hospitality venues. She said that currently contact tracing was taking place for confirmed Omicron cases however, due to community transmission, this was likely to cease. The main course of action for protection was to receive the booster vaccination. She also reported that the programme for vaccination of 12–15 year-olds was going well.

 

Dr Djuretic reported that hospital admissions were currently stable and that there were two reported cases of staff and two residents in Care Homes with Coronavirus. However, schools had seen an increase in reported cases with 153 cases compared to 59 the previous week. She explained that the Barnet Control Plan had been updated and published, which outlined the actions that would be taken. The main strategy was to continue to encourage residents to get vaccinated as the main form of protection. She said that additional vaccination sessions had been put in place in the Brent Cross area. Overall, the vaccination rates within the Barnet population were high at 73% across all ages.

Dr Djuretic advised that the ‘flu vaccination uptake was currently 25% but was higher within the NHS and Social Care setting at around 42%. She said she would look at the figures from the previous week and was happy to circulate this to Members of the Committee.

Action: Dr Djuretic

Dr Charlotte Benjamin advised that the vaccine take up in Barnet was better than the overall average for London. She explained that overall people in Barnet were keen to be vaccinated and that work was taking place in collaboration with Public Health to reach those more hesitant about having the vaccine. Dr Benjamin said that children could access the vaccine via the school programme and that a clinic had been set up in PCN2 and PCN3 for any who had missed the school session or for those home schooled.

Dr Benjamin reported that those dying in hospital were predominantly un-vaccinated and that the best protection came from having both the first and second dose. She advised the Committee that AstraZeneca was starting to be introduced for those requiring a third dose of the vaccine and were housebound, as the vaccine did  ...  view the full minutes text for item 8.

9.

Childhood Inoculation (Agenda item 9) pdf icon PDF 407 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Chairman invited to the table:

·         Ms Bhavita Vishram, Public Health Strategist, LBB

·         Dr Janet Djomba, Consultant in Public Health, LBB

 

Ms Vishram introduced the report and explained that partnerships were essential to the delivery of an effective, equitable and quality assured immunisation service. Ms Vishram explained that the Action Plan had been developed together with a range of stakeholders. She said that learning had been taken from the Covid vaccination programmes and would be implemented into the Action Plan. She also said that there were a number of opportunities to promote vaccines in Barnet and the aim was to share best practice and to offer support where required. Ms Vishram highlighted the benefits of the collaborative work and the range of stakeholders involved, which was helping to reduce inequalities.

 

A Member commented on how the work was exciting and that tackling health inequalities was always a priority for Members. The Member also said that adults were often much more willing to accept vaccinations if they had been vaccinated in childhood, so education about the importance of vaccinations was crucial. The Member said it would be exciting to see the impact of the Action Plan in local communities.

 

A Member queried why children were being vaccinated for cervical cancer and genital warts at such a young age. Dr Djuretic explained that the programme of vaccination had started in 2008 and the vaccine had resulted in a measurable drop in cases. Dr Djuretic also explained that the vaccine was only effective before the young person becomes sexually active, which is why the age range is young.

 

The Chairman asked why London was seeing a decline in vaccinations and whether this was associated with increased misinformation. Ms Vishram explained it was difficult to accurately record the reasons as the populations were so transient. The Chairman also asked if all GPs currently have a designated immunisation lead to proactively identify all those with uncertain or incomplete MMR status. Ms Vishram said that an immunisation Task and Finish Group was collating this list which ideally each GP should have.

 

A Member questioned the dropping trend in 2021 and asked whether this had been because of the pandemic. Ms Vishram said that there had been a decline identified across all PCNs, but a strategy had been devised to collate this information and outline how GPs could be supported to improve this. She said that the PCNs that were struggling the most would be given support.

 

Dr Djuretic said there was a concern around a measles outbreak for all Directors of Public Health. This potential threat was being escalated to all services to try and improve the vaccination uptake, but there was limited capacity within the system. She said that across the country everyone was working hard to put more resources into catching up on vaccinations. The Infection Control Practioner (ICP) workstreams included inequalities and also prioritisation of childhood immunisations, with Officers hoping to see an effect within three to six months. Dr Djuretic said she  ...  view the full minutes text for item 9.

10.

Mid-year quality accounts (Agenda item 10) pdf icon PDF 257 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

North London Hospice

 

The Chairman invited the following to the table:

 

         Fran Deane, Director of Clinical Services, North London Hospice.

         Nada Schiavone, Assistant Director Quality, North London Hospice

 

The Chairman thanked the North London Hospice for the mid-year Quality Accounts submission.

 

Ms Deane advised that the North London Hospice currently had 10 new volunteers for front of house roles, who had replaced those that had not returned due to age or ill health reasons. Ms Deane said there had been some issues around staff recruitment in other roles but that this was common across the sector.

 

She also advised that, in relation to medication incidents, research was being done to investigate how Care Homes administer their drugs in order to share best practice. However, more controlled drugs were used at the Hospice compared with Care Homes, so liaison with other Hospices would also be taking place. Ms Deane also raised the point that there was a positive attitude within the organisation in terms of staff wanting to report near misses and incidences of error, to be open and transparent and to create a culture of improvement. She said that approximately over 250 medicines are administered each day, so when looking at the overall number of incidents, the numbers were very small and most medication errors caused no harm to patients. However, the Hospice is dedicated to continually reducing the numbers of errors.

 

A Member asked if the need for reporting incidents was included in training and upskilling sessions for staff so that they understood the importance of doing this. Ms Schiavone confirmed that competency was a significant focus within all training and that the education team worked closely with any members of staff requiring additional support. She also said that staff were counselled in relation to any near misses in order to avoid similar incidences reoccurring.

 

A Member raised concerns regarding the number of medication errors as they felt that even a small error was still a major incident. The Member asked what measures or processes were being put in place to ensure these errors were avoided at all costs and whether the staff were medically trained. Ms Schiavone said there is primarily a focus on staff competence and that individual performance was regularly reviewed. She said there was an on-site education team available for support as well as senior nurses on duty on every shift to provide medical advice. Ms Schiavone stressed that all incidents were investigated as soon as they occurred and were taken very seriously, and that staff regularly attended Hospice webinars to learn from others. Ms Schiavone clarified that the incidents were not always in relation to providing the wrong drug or dosage, often they were minor errors.

 

A Member asked if the Clinical strategy would be included within the Quality Accounts. Ms Deane said she was happy to forward a copy for circulation to Committee Members. A Member also requested more information in relation to the projects being undertaken. Ms Deane agreed to  ...  view the full minutes text for item 10.

11.

Accessing your GP remotely verbal update (Agenda item 11)

Minutes:

The Chairman invited the following to the table:

 

  • Colette Wood, Director of Integration, North Central London Clinical Commissioning Group (NCL CCG) Joined virtually
  • Dr Charlotte Benjamin, Vice-Chairman North Central London Clinical

           Commissioning Group (NCL CCG)

  • Ms Janice Tausig – Chairman of the Dr Azim and Partners Patient Participation Group (PPG)
  • Two Carers – Mrs Shah and Mr Gallagher

·         John MCLINDEN, Divisional Director of Nursing and Therapies, North Central

       Division, Central London Community Healthcare Trust (CLCH).

·         Denis Enright, Director of Operations at Central London Community Health Care

       NHS Trust (CLCH)

 

 

Mrs Shah provided an account of her personal experiences when trying to access her GP. Mrs Shah explained that she was still waiting to receive her hearing aid, with long delays since 2019 having arisen due to referrals from her doctor not being properly processed. She advised that she had received batteries for a hearing aid in the post that did not belong to her, because of messages not being properly conveyed between medical departments.

 

Mrs Shah also explained that her husband had been allocated both a nurse and a doctor due to his disabilities. Since being allocated these two professionals, the doctor had only visited her husband on one occasion in the last two years for an introductory meeting. Mrs Shah said she had not received any assistance from them since the first meeting, with her messages and calls going unanswered or without response.

 

Mrs Shah said she had tried numerous ways to contact her GP using the phone and computer but was not very confident with computer use and so she had to rely on family to assist. The situation was making life difficult and distressing.

 

Dr Benjamin thanked Mrs Shah for bringing her personal story to the attention of Members and Officers and apologised for the difficulties she had faced. Dr Benjamin explained that long delays were being seen in audiology because of Covid. She advised that Covid had meant that many staff working in the department had been redeployed elsewhere in the hospital to help with covid patients and that audiology was one of the last services to be set back up, due to the risks surrounding transmission and infection.

 

Dr Benjamin acknowledged that some patients found using technology like E-consult or Patches difficult and that alternatives for accessing GPs was important. She noted that the entire medical system was overloaded and that Officers were working to deal with the issues as efficiently and effectively as possible.

 

The Chairman then invited Mr Gallagher to the table to share his personal experience. Mr Gallagher explained that he was a Carer for his father who had vascular dementia. His father had had a fall last year and was admitted to hospital and during the stay he was taken off his medication. After returning home, Mr Gallagher tried to sort out getting his father back onto his medication but found the experience very difficult. He contacted the GP by both phone and email but found getting through to a doctor  ...  view the full minutes text for item 11.

12.

Health Overview and Scrutiny Forward Work Programme (Agenda item 12) pdf icon PDF 289 KB

Minutes:

10 February:

-           Children’s Oral Health Report

-           Coronavirus and ‘Flu Vaccination Update

-           Long Covid Update

 

25 May:

-           End of year Quality Accounts

 

6 July:

-           Solutions 4 Health Update

-           Alternative Provider Medical Services (APMS) Cricklewood Update

 

To be allocated:

-           Suicide Prevention Strategy Update- July or 19 October 2022

 

RESOLVED that the Committee noted the Forward Work Programme.

 

 

13.

Any Other Items that the Chairman Decides are Urgent (Agenda item13) pdf icon PDF 433 KB

Minutes:

Barnet Healthy Child Programme (HCP) Services Update on Contract Award Decision

 

Dr Djuretic explained that a paper had been taken to Policy and Resources Committee in February 2017 which outlined different options and feasibility studies that were undertaken in relation to each of the options. She explained that when the In-House options were reviewed, it was agreed that this was not the best option. The decision was therefore taken to go out to procurement. Dr Djuretic explained that the programme had been inherited by the Local Authority from the CCG in 2015 without many performance indicators, which made it difficult to drive through improvements.

 

Dr Djuretic explained that a closed procurement took place in 2019 via a Section 75, two bids were received, however one was a non-complaint bid. The award was given to the other bid in 2019 however, subsequently, in January the bid was withdrawn, so the Local Authority had no option but to extend the CLCH contract.

 

In the meantime, Officers tried to secure a procurement with another NHS NCL provider, but the CCG did not support this as they felt it was not the appropriate time. The Local Authority was left with only one option which was to go through an open procurement which resulted in bids from two NHS providers and one private provider. Solutions 4 Health received the highest score and their bid demonstrated an ability to deliver the Healthy Child Programme Services as specified within the service specification and within the budget. Solutions 4 Health demonstrated that they have experience of delivering HCP and other NHS services elsewhere and that they share the values of Barnet Council in putting children and families first.

 

Consequently, several consultations and meetings with staff took place, due to the change in moving from an NHS provider to a private one. The main concern and focus was on ensuring the improvement of services and ensuring that there was no impact on outcomes for children.

 

A Member raised concerns that this was the second time a private contractor had been chosen and the process had not felt particularly open. The Member also said that the HOSC had a clear interest as previous reports had been scrutinised in 2017. The Member said it had been clear at the end of the Policy and Resources Committee that Members wished for in-house solutions to be looked at, due to key areas of the service under performing. The Member felt that once the in-house option had been found to be unsuitable, the item should have been brought back to the Committee to allow scrutiny and challenge. The Member also asked what the contingency was in the event that the provider failed to deliver within the financial envelope agreed for these services.

 

Dr Djuretic explained that the process had been transparent throughout and that the Report was taken back to the Policy and Resources Committee. She said the HOSC did not play a role in scrutinising procurement processes. Dr Djuretic explained that the financial  ...  view the full minutes text for item 13.