Agenda item

Opposition Motion in the name of Councillor Kath McGuirk - North Finchley Crown Post Office

Minutes:

Councillor Kath McGuirk moved the motion in her name.  Councillor Hugh Rayner moved the amendment in his name.  Councillor Tim Roberts moved an amendment in his name.

 

During debate, Councillor Hugh Rayner moved, that under Council Procedure Rule 10.9 moved, "that the question be now put".  This was seconded by Councillor Reuben Thompstone.  Votes were recorded as follows:

 

For

32

Against

31

Abstain

0

Absent

0

TOTAL

63

 

 

The amendment in the name of Councillor Tim Roberts was put to the vote.

 

Votes were recorded as follows:

 

For

31

Against

32

Abstain

0

Absent

0

TOTAL

63

 

At least ten members called for a formal division on the voting. Upon the vote being taken, the results of the division were declared as follows:

 

 

For

Against

Not Voting

Absent

Maureen Braun

ü

 

Jess Brayne

ü

 

 

 

Rebecca Challice

ü

 

Pauline Coakley Webb

ü

 

 

 

Dean Cohen

 

ü

 

 

Jack Cohen

ü

 

 

 

Melvin Cohen

 

ü

 

Philip Cohen

ü

 

 

 

Geof Cooke

ü

 

 

 

Alison Cornelius

 

ü

 

 

Richard Cornelius

 

ü

 

 

Tom Davey

 

ü

 

 

Val Duschinsky

 

ü

 

 

Paul Edwards

ü

 

 

Claire Farrier

ü

 

 

 

Anthony Finn

ü

 

 

Brian Gordon

ü

 

 

Eva Greenspan

ü

 

 

Rohit Grover

 

ü

 

 

Helena Hart

ü

 

 

John Hart

ü

 

 

Ross Houston

ü

 

 

 

Anne Hutton

ü

 

 

 

Andreas Ioannidis

ü

 

 

 

Devra Kay

ü

 

 

Sury Khatri

 

ü

 

 

Adam Langleben

ü

 

 

 

Kathy Levine

ü

 

 

David Longstaff

 

ü

 

 

Kitty Lyons

ü

 

 

John Marshall

 

ü

 

 

Kath McGuirk

ü

 

 

Arjun Mittra

ü

 

 

 

Alison Moore

ü

 

 

 

Ammar Naqvi

ü

 

 

 

Nagas Narenthira

ü

 

 

 

Charlie O’Macauley

ü

 

 

 

Graham Old

 

ü

 

 

Alon Or-Bach

ü

 

 

Reema Patel

ü

 

 

Bridget Perry

 

ü

 

 

Wendy Prentice

 

ü

 

 

Sachin Rajput

 

ü

 

 

Barry Rawlings

ü

 

 

Hugh Rayner

 

ü

 

 

Tim Roberts

ü

 

Gabriel Rozenberg

 

ü

 

 

Lisa Rutter

 

ü

 

 

Shimon Ryde

 

ü

 

Brian Salinger

 

ü

 

 

Gill Sargeant

ü

 

Joan Scannell

 

ü

 

Alan Schneiderman

ü

 

Mark Shooter

 

ü

 

Agnes Slocombe

ü

 

 

Stephen Sowerby

 

ü

 

Caroline Stock

 

ü

 

 

Daniel Thomas

 

ü

 

 

Reuben Thompstone

 

ü

 

 

Jim Tierney

ü

 

 

 

Laurie Williams

ü

 

 

 

Peter Zinkin

 

ü

 

 

Zakia Zubairi

ü

 

 

 

The amendment was declared lost.

 

The amendment in the name of Councillor Hugh Rayner was put to the vote.

 

Votes were recorded as follows:

 

For

32

Against

31

Abstain

0

Absent

0

TOTAL

63

 

The amendment was declared carried. 

 

RESOLVED that:

 

Council notes a campaign has been launched to prevent the proposed conversion of North Finchley Post Office into a franchise and to maintain it as Crown Post Office. Council notes this will result in a reduced service with longerqueues and waiting times for customers.

 

Since the mass closure of Crown Post Offices began under the previous

Labour government, some 97% are now franchises, leading in many cases to longer opening hours and greater convenience for customers. Indeed, despite Labour members’ involvement in the campaign against the closure of East Finchley Crown Post Office in 2014, Council notes that the franchise is now open for longer. It is also open on Sundays, unlike North Finchley Post Office.

 

Council notes a Financial Times report on East Finchley Post Office, published on 15th August 2016, which described how “Customers appear satisfied with the service.” The newspaper quoted Gloria Benson, 50, who said “It’s a wonderful post office. The old post office was a nightmare you had to wait for a long time” and Marc Schaller, 38, who said “I felt for a long time the post office needed to update and modernise.”

 

Council wants to support and rejuvenate our Town Centres and believes this kind of innovative entrepreneurial partnership complements our aim and is in the best interests of customers.

 

Council therefore instructs officers to set out LB Barnet's position on the proposed closure in a response to the Post Office Ltd consultation.

 

 

Before the consideration of the following motions, the Mayor asked whether Council wished to debate further motions in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 2.1 15.  Votes were recorded as follows:

 

 

For

31

Against

32

Abstain

0

Absent

0

TOTAL

63

 

The following motions were therefore put to the vote without debate.

 

Supporting documents: