Agenda and minutes

No apologies received.

Councillors Slocombe, Farrier, Gordon and Sargeant were not present at the start of the meeting and did not partake or vote on the Sydney Road agenda item.

None.

The Committee received the report.

Representations were heard from Mr Hanneman, Ms Sue Rothstein and the applicant

RESOLVED that the application be approved, subject to the conditions detailed in the report.

The Committee received the report.

Representations were heard from Mr Tankel, Mr Grevatt and the applicant’s agent.

A vote on the recommendations contained within the report, to approve the application was taken:

It was moved by Councillor Farrier and seconded by Councillor Braun that the application be refused for reasons stated in points 1, 2 and 4, paragraph 5.3, page 23 of the agenda.

RESOLVED that the application be refused for the reasons stated above.

The Committee received the report.

Representations were heard from Gavin Littaur and the applicant’s agent.

RESOLVED that the application be approved, subject to the conditions detailed in the report.

The Committee received the report and addendum.

Representations were heard from Mr Wakefield, Councillor John Hart and the applicant’s agent.

RESOLVED that the application be approved, subject to the conditions detailed in the report and the addendum.

The Committee received the report.

Representations were heard from Roger Huby, John Canavan and the applicant’s agent.

RESOLVED that the application be approved, subject to the conditions detailed in the report.

The Committee received the report and addendum.

Representations were heard from Dr Cesira de Chiara, Dr Giuseppe Nicatro and the applicant’s agent.

A vote was taken on the recommendations to approve the application, as detailed in the report:

It was proposed by Councillor Farrier and seconded that the application be refused on the following grounds:

1)    The proposed development would by reason of its resulting prominence and the design, size, scale and massing would have a harmful impact on character and appearance of the streetscene and the visual amenities of the surrounding areas. As such, the proposed development would be contrary to policy DM01 of the Adopted Local Plan Development Management Policies DPD (2012).

2)    The proposed development would by reason of the change in land levels, its proximity to the neighbouring at 14 Engel Park in conjunction with its size, scale and massing would have an overbearing and harmful impact on the residential amenity of the occupiers of that property.  As such, the proposed development would be contrary to policy DM01 of the Adopted Local Plan Development Management Policies DPD (2012).

RESOLVED that the application be refused for the reasons detailed above.

The Committee received the report.

A representation was heard from the applicant.

RESOLVED that the application be approved, subject to the conditions detailed in the report.

The Committee received the report and addendum.

Representations were heard from Marie McHale and Spiro Novruzaj.

At this point of the meeting the OHP equipment failed.

Members took the view that they were not in a position to make a decision on this application or any of the remaining items without appropriate graphical evidence and were advised by Officers to defer the items to the next meeting.

Consequently, the only item left to consider were the minutes of the last meeting.

RESOLVED that this application and all the remaining applications be deferred until the next meeting of the Committee.

RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting held on 15 June 2016 be agreed as a correct record, subject to the following amendment:

55 SHEAVESHILL AVENUE - 160948FUL - CHANGE OF USE FROM RESIDENTIAL TO GP SURGERY

The Committee considered the planning officer’s report and addendum. Oral presentations were heard from Mr Patrick Jacob,  and Miss Hasina Ahmed and Councillor Narenthira in objection to the planning application.  The applicant Dr Ijeoma Ukachukwu also spoke in support of her application.

The motion to approve was proposed by Councillor Rayner and seconded by Councillor Khatri Shooter.

Votes were as follows:

Deferred until next meeting.

Deferred until next meeting.

Deferred until next meeting.

Items contained within the addendum, were dealt with under individual agenda items.

None.