Agenda and minutes

RESOLVED that Councillor John Hart be appointed as chairman of the sub-committee.

None

None

The procedure was noted.

The sub-committee considered the licensing officer’s report, together with submissions from the applicant and the premises licence holder.

RESOLVED that the parties be excluded from the meeting, together with the press and public, in accordance with regulation 14(2) of the Licensing Act 2003 (Hearings Regulations) 2005.

The sub-committee retired to deliberate in private session, accompanied by the council’s legal and governance officers, to consider the facts of the application and the measures necessary (if any) to ensure the promotion of the licensing objectives.

The parties to the application were readmitted to the meeting and the chairman conveyed the sub-committee’s decision as follows:

This was a review of the premises licence for Costcutter 2-4 Varley Parade The Hyde, Edgware Road NW9 6RR. The review had been called by the Metropolitan Police Service following a joint inspection of the premises with the Immigration Service on 14 November 2014, which discovered that one of the people working there had been working in breach of section 15 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 in that his working visa had expired on 30 October 2012.

The Immigration Service served a referral notice on the premises. Following an investigation by the Immigration Service, a civil penalty notice was imposed.

Sergeant Altman, the applicant for the review, made representations on behalf of the Metropolitan Police Service and confirmed that the Immigration Service had dealt with this as a civil matter and that the matter had not been deemed to be appropriate for prosecution. Sergeant Altman stated that this was a first time offence and in his view; it had been on the lower scale of seriousness of offence. In light of this, Sergeant Altman confirmed that an agreement had been reached between the Metropolitan Police Service and the premises licence holder with regards to the imposition of additional conditions on the premises licence.

Mr Trevor Hughes from J and H Licensing Consultants was in attendance on behalf of Mr Pararajasingam Satheeswaren, the premises licence holder. Mr Hughes stated that when the review application was brought by the Metropolitan Police Service, the matter was still under investigation by the Immigration Service, hence the review papers incorrectly stated that the employee concerned did not have the right to work. Mr Hughes stated that the employee had a right to work from April 2011 but that this entitlement had expired on 30 October 2012. Mr Hughes clarified that the employee concerned had been working in breach as opposed to having no right to work. This breach had continued for over a two year period.

Upon employing the employee, the premises licence holder had taken a photocopy of the employee’s passport and taken the employee’s national insurance number. Mr Hughes stated that this was not a case where the licensee had knowingly employed an illegal immigrant; rather it was one where he had employed someone who had the right to work for a limited time. The premises licence holder had made the mistake of not checking whether the employee’s entitlement to work in the UK had expired. Mr Hughes stated that section 11.27 of the guidelines to the Licensing Act was irrelevant in the circumstances. The guidelines included a list of matters that should be taken very seriously by a licensing authority when determining a review application. The employment of people not entitled to work in this country was on that list. This was not, however, relevant in the circumstances as that provision related to criminal activity. Mr Hughes confirmed that  ...  view the full minutes text for item 8.

None