Agenda and minutes

RESOLVED – That the decisions of the meeting held on 08 May 2012 and 22 May 2012 be signed as an accurate record.

Apologyof absence was received from Councillor Gill Sargeant and an apology of lateness from Councillor Jack Cohen.

The following declarations of interest were made:

Marks & Spencer Plc, 820-832 Finchley Road, London, NW11 6XL

Councillor John Marshall declared a personal and non-prejudicial interest as he is a shareholder of Marks and Spencer.  Councillor Marshall took part in the consideration and voting process.

39A & 39B Flower Lane, London, NW7 2JN

Councillor John Marshall declared a personal and prejudicial interest as one of the objectors was known to him.  Councillor Marshall withdrew from the meeting and took part no part in the consideration and voting process.

Former 261, Hale Lane, Edgware, Middx, HA8 8NX

Councillor Darrel Yawitch declared a personal and prejudicial interest as he is a School Governor at the School.  Councillor Yawitch withdrew from the meeting and took no part in the consideration and voting process.

58 Clifton Gardens, London, NW11 7EL

Councillor Melvin Cohen declared a personal and non-prejudicial interest as the site address neighbours his office of employment.  Councillor Cohen took part in the consideration and voting process.

51 Uphill Road, London, NW7 4PR

Councillor Melvin Cohen declared a personal and prejudicial interest as one of the objectors was known to him. 

100-102 Leeside Crescent, London, NW11 0LA

Prior to addressing the Sub-Committee, Ward Member Councillor Dean Cohen declared a personal and non-prejudicial interest as he is on the mailing list for the site.  He noted that the applicant was known to him.  Councillor Dean Cohen is not a Member or Substitute Member of the West Area Planning Sub-Committee and therefore was not able to contribute to the consideration or voting process.

There were none.

There were none.

The sub-Committee:

RESOLVED TO DEFER the application to a future meeting as the transaction of business expired.

The sub-Committee:

RESOLVED TO DEFER the application to a future meeting as the transaction of business expired.

The sub-Committee:

RESOLVED TO DEFER the application to a future meeting as the transaction of business expired.

The sub-Committee:

RESOLVED TO DEFER the application to a future meeting as the transaction of business expired.

The sub-Committee:

RESOLVED TO DEFER the application to a future meeting as the transaction of business expired.

The sub-Committee:

RESOLVED TO DEFER the application to a future meeting as the transaction of business expired.

The sub-Committee noted the receipt of the additional information as set out in the tabled addendum.

The sub-Committee having heard from Mr Gold and Mr Raffles who spoke against the application and a response from the applicant’s representative.

RESOLVED TO APPROVE the application as per the Officer’s report and subject to the conditions as set out in the report and the addendum.

 The sub-Committee:

RESOLVED TO DEFER the application to a future meeting as the transaction of business expired.

The sub-Committee noted the receipt of the additional information as set out in the tabled addendum.

The sub-Committee having heard from Mr Domb and Mr Shear who spoke against the application.

RESOLVED TO APPROVE the application as per the Officer’s report and subject to the conditions as set out in the report and the addendum.

The sub-Committee noted the receipt of the additional information as set out in the tabled addendum.

The sub-Committee having heard from Mr Moss and Dr Bradley who spoke against the application.

RESOLVED TO APPROVE the application as per the Officer’s report and subject to the conditions as set out in the report and the addendum

The sub-Committee noted the receipt of the additional information as set out in the tabled addendum.

The sub-Committee having heard from Mrs Youle and Mrs Bialoglowski who spoke against the application and a response from the applicant’s representative.

RESOLVED TO Defer the application, to enable officers to discuss with the applicant an amendment to the Parking Order to restrict future occupiers from purchasing resident parking permits.

The sub-Committee noted the receipt of the additional information as set out in the tabled addendum.

The sub-Committee having heard from Mr Ryde, Mr Reifer, Ward Member Councillor Dean Cohen who spoke in support of the application and a response from the applicant.

RESOLVED TO APPROVE the application being a Reversal of officer’s recommendation subject to the following conditions and informatives which were circulated to Members.  The Sub-Committee adjoured for 10 minutes in order to consider this:

APPENDIX 1:

100-102 Leeside Crescent conditions and informatives:

CONDITIONS:

1- Approved Plans

The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans:  Site plan; 1203.1; 1203.2; 1203.3; 1203.4; 1203.5; 1203.8; 1203.9; 1203.10, Supporting information.

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning.

2- Time Limit on Full Permission

This development must be begun within three years from the date of this permission.

Reason: To comply with Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act, 2004.

3- Specified Purpose

The ground floor and part first floor of the premises shall be used as a Synagogue and Kolel and other ancillary uses as shown on the hereby approved drawings and no other purpose (including any other purpose, including a separate school, crèche, nursery, health facility and any other type of non-orthodox Jewish facilities) in Class D1 of the Schedule to the Town and Country Planning Use Classes Order, 1987, or in any provision equivalent to that Class in any statutory instrument revoking and re-enacting that Order, with or without modification). 

Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to exercise control of the type of use within the category in order to safeguard the amenities of the area.

4- Materials to Match

The materials to be used in the external surfaces of the building shall match those used in the existing building.

Reason: To safeguard the visual amenities of the building and the surrounding area.

5- Rear amenity space

The rear yard shall be used only be the residents of the flats and not used at any time in connection with the synagogue use.

Reason: To protect the amenities of neighbouring occupiers and provide sufficient outdoor amenity space for future residents

6- Parking:

Before any construction works start on site, turning space and parking spaces shall be provided and marked out within the site in accordance with a scheme to be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority and that area shall not thereafter be used for any purpose other than the parking and turning of vehicles.

Reason: To ensure that parking and associated works are provided in accordance with the council's standards in the interests of pedestrian and highway safety and the free flow of traffic.

7- Ventilation and Extraction Equipment - Details Required

Before any construction works start on site, details of any extraction and ventilation equipment shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority before the development hereby permitted commences on  ...  view the full minutes text for item 6n

The sub-Committee:

RESOLVED TO DEFER the application to a future meeting as the transaction of business expired.

The Sub-Committee noted that as objectors withdrew their objections this application was withdrawn from the agenda and therefore not considered or determined by the Sub-Committee. 

The sub-Committee noted the receipt of the additional information as set out in the tabled addendum.

The sub-Committee having heard from Mr Boyle and Karin Harrision who spoke in objection to the application and a response from the applicants representative.

RESOLVED TO APPROVE the application as per the Officer’s report and subject to the conditions as set out in the report and the addendum and subject to condition 16 as outlined below details to be brought back to the sub-Committee for approval.

Condition 16

The sub-Committee noted the receipt of the additional information as set out in the tabled addendum.

The sub-Committee having considered the representation from the Friends of Windsor Open Space and heard a response from the applicant’s representative.

The sub-Committee:

RESOLVED TO AGREE the recommendation as per the Officer’s report (SPLIT DECISION) and subject to the conditions as set out in the report and the addendum.

The sub-Committee:

RESOLVED TO CONFIRM the tree preservation order without modification as per the Officer’s report and advise the objector(s).

The Sub-Committee:

RESOLVED TO CONFIRM the tree preservation order without modification as per the Officer’s report and advise the objector(s).

There were no items the Chairman deemed were urgent.