Agenda and minutes

RESOLVED – That the decisions of the meeting held on 2 April 2012 were approved as a correct record.

Apology of absence was received Councillor Eva Greenspan and Councillor John Marshall.  

Tudor Cottage, 64 Marsh Lane, London, NW7 4NT

Councillor Jack Cohen declared a personal and prejudicial interest as one of the objectors was known to him.  CouncillorCohen withdrew from the meeting and took part no part in the consideration and voting process.

None

None

RESOLVED – That the Council’s decisions on the applications listed below be as indicated and that the Assistant Director of Planning and Development Management be instructed to convey such decisions to the applicants. An addendum was circulated detailing the following;

All references in the recommendations which refer to the Assistant Director of Planning and Development Management should be amended to refer to the “Acting Assistant Director of Planning and Building Control.”

All reference in the recommendations and reports to any Planning Policy Guidance (PPG) or Planning Policy Statements (PPS) should be removed. All PPGs and PPSs have been replaced by the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) which was published on 27 March 2012. It is considered that all applications comply with the relevant policies within the NPPF.

The sub-Committee noted the receipt of an amendment to informative 2 and 5 as set out within the addendum to the report.

The sub-Committee having heard from MrGraham speaking against the application.

RESOLVED TO APPROVE the application as per the Officer’s report and subject to the conditions as set out in the report and addendum.

The sub-Committee noted an amendment to informative 6 as set out within the addendum to the report.

The sub-Committee having heard from Mr Matthew Curtis speaking against the application and the applicant’s response;

 RESOLVED TO APPROVE the application as per the Officer’s report and subject to the conditions as set out in the report and addendum.

The sub-Committee noted the receipt of an amendment to condition 1 set out with in the addendum to the report.

RESOLVED TO APPROVE the application as per the Officer’s report and subject to the conditions as set out in the report and the addendum.

The sub-Committee noted the receipt of an amendment to informative 7 as set out within the tabled addendum.

The sub-Committee having heard from Professor RJ Guiloff and Mr Stanley Gelbier and Ward Member Councillor Daniel Thomas who spoke against the application and the applicant’s agent response;

RESOLVED TO APPROVE the application as per the Officer’s report and subject to the conditions as set out in the report and the addendum

The sub-Committee noted the receipt of an additional objection and noted that the total number of objections was 5 as set out in the tabled addendum.

The sub-Committee having heard from Mr Blasswho spoke against the application and the applicant’s agent response;

RESOLVED TO APPROVE the application as per the Officer’s report and subject to the conditions as set out in the report and the addendum.

The sub-Committee:

RESOLVED TO DEFERthe application to a future meeting as the transaction of business expired.

The sub-Committee:

RESOLVED TO DEFERthe application to a future meeting as the transaction of business expired.

The sub-Committee:

RESOLVED TO DEFERthe application to a future meeting as the transaction of business expired.

The sub-Committee having heard from Mr Papageorgiadis and Mr Sanchez who spoke in objection to the application.  The applicant’s agent spoke in response:

Deferred the application to a future meeting in order for a site visit to take place.

The sub-Committee noted that the addendum to the report highlighted that the application address falls within the Childs Hill Ward.

The sub-Committee having heard from Mr Behzad who spoke against the application and the applicant’s agent spoke in response;

RESOLVED TO APPROVE the application as per the Officer’s report and subject to the conditions as set out in the report and the addendum and subject to the following:

·         Amend condition 10 to read:

“Before any building works start on site, details of the hours of construction shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To ensure that the development does not prejudice the safety of Wessex Garden school children.

·         Add additional informative:

“The applicant is advised that the planning committee will not favourably consider the conversion of the property into three flats”.

The sub-Committee noted an amendment to the report as set out with the addendum to the officer’s report.

The sub-Committee having heard from Mr Tillie who spoke against the application and the applicant’s response;

RESOLVED TO REFUSE the application (this being a reversal of the Officer’s recommendation) for the following reason;

2.    No undertaking has been given by the developer to meet identified additional educational, health, libraries and monitoring costs which would be incurred by the community as a result of the development, contrary to Policy CS1, CS8, CS13 of the Barnet Adopted Unitary Development Plan (2006) and Adopted Supplementary Planning Document on Contributions to Education (2008), Libraries (2008), Health (2009) and Monitoring (2006).

The sub-Committee:

RESOLVED TO DEFERthe application to a future meeting as the transaction of business expired.

The sub-Committee:

RESOLVED TO DEFERthe application to a future meeting as the transaction of business expired.

The sub-Committee:

RESOLVED TO DEFERthe application to a future meeting as the transaction of business expired.

The sub-Committee:

RESOLVED TO DEFERthe application to a future meeting as the transaction of business expired.

The sub-Committee noted an amendment to informative 3 as set out in the tabled addendum.

The sub-Committee having heard from Mr Lewis and Mr Tilleywho spoke against the application and the applicant’s agent response;

RESOLVED TO APPROVE the application as per the Officer’s report and subject to the conditions as set out in the report and the addendum

The sub-Committee having heard from Mr Lewis and Mr Tilleywho spoke against the application and the applicant’s agent’s response;

RESOLVED TO APPROVE the application as per the Officer’s report and subject to the conditions as set out in the report and the addendum

The sub-Committee having heard from Mr Clark who spoke in objection to the application. 

RESOLVED TO APPROVE the application as per the Officer’s report and subject to the conditions as set out in the report.

That it be noted that Councillor Hugh Rayner voted to refuse this application.

RESOLVED TO APPROVE the application as per the Officer’s report and subject to the conditions as set out in the report.

The sub-Committee noted an amendment to the officers report and also an amendment to informative 6, an amendment to condition 1, 3 and 8 as set out within the officers report.

The sub-Committee having heard from Mr Pein and Mr Pattihis Clark who spoke against the application and the applicant’s response;

RESOLVED TO REFUSE the application (this being a reversal of the Officer’s recommendation) for the following reason;

That it be noted that Councillor Sury Khatri voted to refuse this application.

None